Board Logo
« DEBUNKING DR. MICHAEL WOLF (KRUVANT) »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Jul 23rd, 2017, 10:46pm


EARTH'S TWIN? NASA's Kepler Mission Announces Latest Discovery

blogblogblogblog
ALIEN CASEBOOK ALIEN CASEBOOK

CLICK THIS PICTURE TO SEE A REVIEW OF THE ENTIRE YEAR OF 2008

2008 Ufology Review

MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected

Copyright only pertains to authors alien_contactee and Atrueoriginall

THE CENTRAL SCRUTINIZER REPORT

THE CENTRAL SCRUTINIZER REPORT

« Previous Topic | Next Topic »
Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
 sticky  Author  Topic: DEBUNKING DR. MICHAEL WOLF (KRUVANT)  (Read 4137 times)
alien_contactee
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Please understand that my experiences as a contactee and abductee are never to be found in your book!


Homepage PM


Posts: 2835
xx DEBUNKING DR. MICHAEL WOLF (KRUVANT)
« Thread started on: Sep 21st, 2007, 06:06am »

I'll still get to this thread soon but in the interim and re: Stanton Friedman.....Michael Wolf Kruvant had none of the six degrees he claimed, was not a colonel/pilot in the Air Force or a consultant to MJ-12.
« Last Edit: Nov 5th, 2007, 3:52pm by alien_contactee » User IP Logged

User Image
alien_contactee
Administrator
ImageImageImageImageImage


member is offline

Avatar

Please understand that my experiences as a contactee and abductee are never to be found in your book!


Homepage PM


Posts: 2835
xx DEBUNKING DR. MICHAEL WOLF
« Reply #1 on: Sep 21st, 2007, 06:06am »

saved for me.
« Last Edit: Sep 21st, 2007, 09:57am by alien_contactee » User IP Logged

User Image
GeorgeLoBuono
Alien Casebook Contributor

member is offline

Avatar




PM


Posts: 1
xx Re: DEBUNKING DR. MICHAEL WOLF (KRUVANT)
« Reply #2 on: Aug 23rd, 2010, 5:14pm »

The problem with Stanton Friedman's claim that Wolf is a fraud is the same problem with some other Friedman assertions. I admit Friedman did some good work on Roswell, but he tries to debunk Col. Philip Corso based on the slimmest of threads, merely a minor aspect of the story. Nonetheless, Friedman dismisses Corso's book. Friedman does the same with Bob Lazar. He looked for Lazar's academic credentials, and despite the fact that Lazar stated he had to sign to have his degrees removed from official record in order to do top secret work, Friedman dismissed Lazar as a fraud. So, two of the biggest stories to date, direct official programs and admissions on the highest level re Roswell and aliens, plus Lazar's story about US possesssion of alien technology go out the window?

Michael Salla's latest book takes Friedman to task on the Corso case, point by point, and does a good job of it. In Salla's opinion, Friedman goes beyond critique and tries to dismiss all that Corso says. The question is why? Friedman also dismisses Michael Wolf Kruvant as a fraud, again on the basis of not locating his academic credentials. Meanwhile, Wolf said he was part of a sub-structural info program re aliens ever since being a child, which, if true, could show why his credentials don't appear. Paola Harris also saw a Bill Clinton photo signed by Clinton to Wolf personally when she interviewed him. And the question would be, why would an articulate, certainly educated man, make up so elaborate and detailed a story if it weren't true. His brother Ron's allegations are very slim, and Friedman's questions to Ron look bad: "Was he a homosexual?" It was all yes or no, not alllowing Ron to say much. Why so abrupt and framed?

The above three cases pose much new, interesting info. If we dismiss all three and only accept what Friedman says, imagine what we won't read about: alien technology, corruption in alien-related programs, alien hybrids--as Corso notes--at Roswell. Do you see the general implications? Meanwhile, what might motivate Friedman? I admit, some might think that Friedman's superficial criterea are good reason to debunk, but do you really think those who work on alien-related programs are completely free to discuss what they did and that their credentials would be preserved by the most anal goons in those programs?

Some feel that Friedman surely must be working for an intel faction that wants to cover up what major whistleblowers have exposed, while others say he's just a narrow-minded person who tries to debunk others by using minor discrepancies to totally, completely discredit others' proven valid details.

Meanwhile, I see that the alien/ufo community is diverse, often argumentative and opinionated. I also think that Friedman's master's degree work in nuclear sciences does not equal the depth of more educated experts who write on such subjects. In particular, I don't see where Friedman allows himself to talk about how alien science and technology works. And the fact that he categorically dismisses some who do makes me wonder what his motives are. We have to venture into new territory, new science, and some of that will invariably be speculative, but can be stated as such. Friedman apparently doesn't go there.

You may think he's simply being careful by assuming that academic credentials MUST be proven. But alien-related programs can be ugly, brutal and extremely corrupt, given their secrecy and inaccountability. To be safe, at this juncture A balanced, open-minded perspective should be maintained, including when sources say, up front, that academic credentials are affected when you work in such programs.
User IP Logged

Pages: 1  Notify Send Topic Print
« Previous Topic | Next Topic »

MyFreeCopyright.com Registered & Protected

Copyright only pertains to authors alien_contactee and Atrueoriginall

CLICK THIS PICTURE TO SEE A REVIEW OF THE ENTIRE YEAR OF 2008

2008 Ufology Review

.

.

blog

********blog *********blog*********blog***********blog********

Return To Top
RETURN TO FORUM HOMEPAGE

adminpm
REPORT DEAD VIDEOS AND LINKS

Register
REGISTER

blog
.
Danielle Lee's - THE SPIRIT GUIDE
.
Download Free
Download For Free

Drone Research Team
VISIT THE DRT

Listen Here
Listen Here

When you think about the distances another civilization would travel, one would have to really wonder why. Sure, some have said to help those of earth but instead, think about what value we may hold that they want and could be stealing. If the human soul exists, what if maybe they're simply stealing for their own needs. They've shown me things. I've felt that of another. It's as if they bring it through me just for show and then take it away. Why do they have such ability to be able to do that to the dead and for that matter, what are they doing with them? Lastly, when and if what is suppose to happen, happens - believe this, It's all a ruse and nothing is as it appears! Don't forget that note and pass it on to your friends and family when it's time. As for the theft of souls, that bothers me something horrible.
Donate $6.99 for 50,000 Ad-Free Pageviews!

| |

This forum powered for FREE by Conforums ©
Sign up for your own Free Message Board today!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Conforums Support | Parental Controls